🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to ban social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

European Trend

In Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are considering parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' youth". The policy could be passed next year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "an tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has asked lawmakers to enact a proposal increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a symbolic motion demanding a ban for minors except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a useful starting point," commented the parliamentarian behind the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but stressing any action must be "supported by robust research".

Previously, interest grew behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. However, the administration committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. One foundation established by the relatives of a young person who died after viewing disturbing platform posts contends that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for minors," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, legislation is largely occurring at the regional government level due to country-wide stalemate.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional time needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills mandating adult authorization for minors to create social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from certain figures to follow this example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Apart from Europe and the US, further countries are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world agencies strike a more cautious stance. Unicef has advised that social media bans carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

While this international debate continues, the policies of Australia and others indicate that governments globally are no longer content to delay for the industry to self-regulate.